Title Image
Categories

The Saskatchewan government was in court last week, defending itself against a lawsuit that accuses the province of failing to take adequate action on climate change. The lawsuit, filed by Climate Justice Saskatoon and seven Saskatchewan residents, challenges the government's expansion of gas-fired electricity generation, arguing it violates fundamental Charter rights.

The plaintiffs allege that Saskatchewan's continued reliance on natural gas for power generation threatens the right to life, liberty, and security, as guaranteed by Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The lawsuit contends that natural gas, while a cleaner-burning fossil fuel, still contributes to greenhouse gas emissions that exacerbate climate change, putting lives at risk through extreme weather events, health impacts, and environmental degradation.

In response, the Saskatchewan government has maintained that natural gas-fired power plants represent the most efficient and cost-effective way to reduce emissions while preserving economic stability. When the lawsuit was first filed last year, provincial representatives argued that cutting emissions too quickly could harm the economy and burden consumers with higher energy costs.

The plaintiffs, however, disagree. In their application to the Court of King's Bench on March 31, they called for the province to set a reasonable timeline for decarbonization, aiming to achieve net-zero emissions by 2035. Specifically, they seek a court order that would require SaskPower, the province’s Crown corporation responsible for electricity, to establish a clear and achievable target for phasing out gas-fired power in favour of cleaner energy alternatives.

This case could set a significant precedent for climate-related lawsuits in Canada, as more individuals and groups turn to the courts to push governments towards more aggressive climate action. Climate Justice Saskatoon and the plaintiffs believe their case highlights the urgency of addressing climate change and its direct impact on public safety and security.